Sunday, January 29, 2012

TOO HOT TO HANDLE: WHAT IF THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY STUDIES ARE TELLING THE TRUTH - IF RADIATION IS IN FACT GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH!

Sometimes I have wondered whether others have thought about the possible consequences of believing the many studies sponsored mainly by the nuclear industry, nuclear weapons industry and organizations promoting nuclear power (and nuclear weapons aside) like IAEA. The studies clearly show out that some amount  of ionizing radiation exposure (It varies from a few millisieverts per year to 50 - 200 millisieverts per year) are in fact not dangerous at all, but strengthening your immunity system and can therefore be seen as a health sustaining factor. Studies like this have been released for decades now and many authorities seem to think now it's time to raise the accepted radiation levels up to 20 millisieverts per year for public as did the Japanese Government  in Fukushima accident fallout area.

Link - ENENEWS:

http://enenews.com/goodards-journal-us-govt-study-says-radioactive-pollution-is-good-for-you-current-radiation-limits-may-not-be-necessary-exact-opposite-conclusion-of-accepted-scientific-research-video

This kind of thinking can be found here: Professor Gerry Thomas sees no radiation risks for eggs and sperm even in Nagasaki and Hiroshima bomb -survivors. This FENSHUI-site makes you understand it all - don't listen to the bulls--- that the anti-nuclear movement is trying to sell to you. All the scientists are saying there is absolutely no evidence of mutations and birth defects caused by nuclear accidents. In fact some level of radiation is good for you! All the anti-nuclear "scientists"  are lacking any competence. They have no real studies to show to support there claims.

It is sad that this type of  thinking is really driving this planet towards a nuclear nightmare. Denying facts is easy but everyone taking this road will have to taste their own medicine some day.

http://www.fengshuisociety.org.uk/?link=SocietyNews&pullNews=671 

But I have found nobody thinking further what this kind of denying the excisting reality means for us all if it will be accepted worldwide.

So, let me explain a bit what I mean (- a few words of wisdom follows - just a warning):

If we think about our post-World War II international politics the most important factor has been preventing a global nuclear war.
And if we ask the military why not to use nuclear weapons in the war they will be answering that the use of such weapons would cause a long lasting radioactive fallout which would not be respecting national borders. And the idea for using them in battle is banned by the international community.


But why is it banned? Because of the great distruction these weapons are causing on the battle field (and for the civilians)? How about napalm or modern effective conventional explosive super-bombs that all the super-powers have? They are not banned by the international community. And why is that? Beacuse they don't leave radioactive fallout that affects people and animals decades afterwards and cause mutations to chromosomes for generations to come as does ionizing radiation spread by the nuclear blasts.

Evidence of this kind of thinking can be found in Gulf War and Balcan War widespread use of depleted uranium in anti-tank munitions. Only few were strongly criticising it before great amount of civilians and allied soldiers got sick and died of this "harmless" substant called DU. The fallout could be detected and diagnosed by scientists, and despite of studies showing no harm of DU for the soldiers involved, more and more alarming studies have showed that people - especially children - are really getting sick and dying because of DU-contamination. So numerous countries have joined to coalition that wants to ban all DU-weapons and their use in battle.
But what if? - It can't be true - or can it?

IF RADIATION IS IN FACT GOOD FOR YOUR HEALTH AND IS USED BY THE EVOLUTION PROCESSES AS A SPECIES STRENGTHENING AGENT! SO THE USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS WOULDN'T DIFFER SO MUCH FROM THE USE OF OTHER WEAPONS...

So tactical use of these weapons wouldn't be so bad after all. Just a limited strike, when necessary. The fallout would only strengthen the survivors... so why not?

If we continue with this kind of logic we'll end up to nuclear WWIII.

That's why I feel it is irresponsible to think that radiation could be good for your health. Please read also the studies that have the opposite point of view! Read the recent low-level radiation health effect studies! And use your own brain and heart!

Alternative studies and links:

 
Nuclear Controversies - IAEA and WHO meetings of Chernobyl -radiation effects on population -video (hard stuff) ENENEWS (Watch the whole video to make conclusions):



Radiation - cancer -ratio is linear - ENENEWS:

http://enenews.com/nuclear-radiologist-dont-be-fooled-paid-industry-consultants-low-doses-ionizing-radiation-cancer
Fresh low level radiation study - 15 countries - ENENEWS/Goddard's Journal video:


JPS

Monday, January 23, 2012

A Japanese 95-year Old Senior Scientist and A Survivor Of Hiroshima A-Bombing Warns For Underestimating Internal Radiation

A Senior Japanese Scientist and the former Chair of the Japan Confederation of A- and H- bomb Sufferers Organizations' Central Consultation  Center - Doctor Shuntaro Hida has recently given a lecture in Yokohama about the FD-accident and internal radiation exposure. He is very concerned about the general underestimating of internal radiation exposure. He has had over 6,000 bura bura -patients (a fatique disease caused by A-bomb radioactive fallout/radiation) during his more than a half century carriere as medical doctor. The symtoms of this disease have been newly recognised among the residents of Chernobyl nuclear accident fallout area. And according to Mr. Hida it wouldn't be strange if similar symptoms would be seen also in Fukushima.

Mr. Hida connects nuclear weapons with the underestimating of the dangers of internal radiation exposure. If the dangers were to be admitted then whole the nuclear weapons arsenal would have to be banned as inhumane weapons-system because of the decades-lasting effects of internal radiation exposure among the survivors of a possible use of any of these weapons. - Mainichi:



A STUDY THAT WAS HELD HIDDEN: JAPAN COULD SURVIVE COMPLETELY WITHOUT NUCLEAR POWER - NO POWER SHORTAGES ON SUMMER 2012

A study was made by the Japanese government last autumn that clearly showed that Japan can manage without nuclear energy next summer (2012). The study was not published, though. So the nuclear power companies had free hands to ask for permission to restart the idling NPP:s. It put pressure on local authorities to accept restarting of the nuclear plants because the common belief was that without restarting the reactors Japan would suffer of lack of electricity and the disaster-crippled economi would have suffered more of this extra power shortage.

Now the information of this study was published by Mainichi:




Wednesday, January 18, 2012

FOR FREE INTERNET INFORMATION PROVIDING - AGAINST PIRATISM!

You propably recognized the SOLARWINDPRONET blog-heading being strange today. I'm voting for free internet -news and blogging! Please do not accept the new US -laws stricktly regulating internet -freedom and making it possible for the big entertainment- /Hollywood -companies to control the internet news-sites and free blogging rights!
JPS

Monday, January 9, 2012

There is no safe dose for radiation

The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) admits on video interview that the nowbeing limits for"safe" radiation are just made up with no scientifical basis. If they had made the safety standars really safe for the human beings and for the environment the nuclear industry couldn't really exist any more. The real problem is how these false radiological safety standards are now affecting the health and lives of people in Japan due to Fukushima accident and also everywhere near the nuclear plants. People are not aware of that their risk of getting cancer is much higher than of those who are not exposed to radiation. Even the normally running nuclear power stations make this risk much higher.
Link by Fukushima Diary:
http://fukushima-diary.com/2011/12/icrp-underestimated-the-low-dose-symptom-risk-by-85/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FukushimaDiary+%28Fukushima+Diary%29

 The new year earthquake 2012 seemed to raise the Cesium- isotopes based radiation around FD crippled power plants. There are some rumors about the spent fuel pool of reactor 4 to be dried out and boiled again but no confirmation has been published by TEPCO or Japanese government.
Links: ENENEWS-Fukushima Diary-EX-SKF:

http://enenews.com/report-spent-fuel-pool-4-lost-water-began-boil-after-70-new-years-quake-plant-worker

http://enenews.com/tepco-new-years-quake-caused-water-level-drop-tank-next-spent-fuel-pool-4

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2012/01/mysterious-spike-in-cesium-fallout-in.html


The worst case scenario in March 2011 included an ecuation zone of 250 km which would have cut Japan in two pieces.

Links: ENENEWS

http://enenews.com/worst-case-scenario-map-showed-japan-cut-half-forced-evacuation-zone-photo 

http://enenews.com/fukushima-worst-case-beyond-250km-could-be-evacuation-zone-covering-reactors-pool-sand-mixture-considered-last-resort 


How many of us know that nuclear energy is already now more expensive than coal, oil, wind and sun power?

Link: WIKIPEDIA - Businessweek
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_new_nuclear_power_plants


http://www.businessweek.com/news/2011-12-20/japan-says-nuclear-power-cost-may-be-50-higher-than-estimated.html 
The Funny Story of the Week:

One of the 540 entrees of the preliminary round of Finnish Broadcasting Company's (YLE) Year 2012 Eurovision Song Contest participated the first round of the contest with an anti-nuclear song called "Isotope Song". Though he didn,t manage to enter to the second round of TOP40 (which, according to my thinking, was no surprize), it can be seen as a positive signal for other songwriters to bring more meaningful lyrics to their songs also for contests like this.

If you want to listen to the "Isotope Song" by Carlos F-Major, you can follow this link:

http://www.carlosf-major.hostoi.com/euro_carlos.html
(Warning: the music is guite rough, underground stuff!)

JPS